The Anthropic Settlement and What It Means for Writers
A record payout, a skeptical judge, and what’s at stake when AI trains on books.
Recently, I received a group email from my literary agency urging its authors to sign up with the law firm in case their books are part of the Bartz v. Anthropic class-action suit. If you’re unfamiliar with the case, a group of writers has alleged that Anthropic (the AI startup behind Claude) trained its model on pirated copies of their books.
In August, Anthropic agreed to pay a staggering $1.5 billion, roughly $3,000 per title across an estimated 500,000 works. Anthropic also promised to delete the illicit files and refrain from using them again. It’s the largest copyright settlement in U.S. history.
To be honest, I didn’t sign up right away. I was busy and distracted with work and, mixing laziness and modesty into a perfect do-nothing cocktail (best served chilled, on summer nights), I told myself it was pretty unlikely that my two little books were among the pirated titles anyway. I starred the email (my version of “deal with it later”) and carried on with my day.
And then, yesterday, I discovered that there was a new twist to the story. It turns out that the judge overseeing the case hasn’t signed off on the settlement at all. Instead of blessing the deal, he criticized it as opaque and possibly unfair to authors, and he’s now demanding a full list of the books involved and a clearer process for how writers can make claims before he’ll even consider approval.
So the battle over how AI companies use and pay for books is still unfolding.
Why Authors Should Care
While the headlines are screaming about billion-dollar settlements, the real lesson is more sobering: nothing is guaranteed for authors yet. A historic payout sounds promising, but until the judge approves the deal—and until the process for claims is clear—writers remain in a gray zone.
This uncertainty underscores three important points:
Transparency matters. We need to know which books are included and how claims will actually be handled.
Copyright registration matters. Only registered works will be eligible, so if you haven’t filed, now’s the time. (Oh, and if you think your publisher did it for you, you might be wrong.)
Collective action matters. It wasn’t one writer who made Anthropic pay attention; it was a group, working together.
Takeaway: The settlement may be historic, but the real fight is making sure writers aren’t an afterthought in the process. Our work is the raw material AI is built on—and if it has value to machines, it should have value to us.
Fair Use (Sort Of) and Flat-Out Theft
The judge’s earlier ruling drew a critical distinction. Training on legally purchased books could qualify as fair use. In other words, once a book is bought, an AI might be allowed to analyze it in the same way a student or critic does. But training on pirated copies was a clear violation.
That distinction is frustrating, to say the least. No writer I know imagines “fair use” means a company can feed their book into an algorithm that can then spit out endless text in the same style. But the law doesn’t move at the pace of technology, and right now, “how the book was acquired” seems to matter as much as “how it’s used.”
Takeaway: Writers should understand that fair use isn’t a guaranteed shield. Whether your work was bought or stolen is central to how the courts are drawing lines, but that doesn’t mean it’ll stay that way.
Licensing and the Future
The music industry offers a cautionary parallel. Napster and Limewire made songs free-for-all. iTunes put a price tag back on them. Then Spotify and streaming showed up—better than piracy, though plenty of musicians argue they’re still getting pennies.
Publishing may be on the same path. For decades, creative industries have gone through the same cycle: free use (piracy), lawsuits, and eventually licensing systems that try to balance creator rights with new technology. That’s where publishing is heading with AI. The exact shape is still unclear—maybe a publisher-run system, maybe collective licensing, maybe direct deals between authors and AI firms. What matters is that once a framework exists, it will be incredibly hard to change later.
Takeaway: A licensing system for books is coming. The framework built now will decide whether it becomes another Spotify, where authors see only scraps, or something that truly respects and rewards the people who create the work.
Your Next Moves
Here are four things to keep on your radar:
Collective action works. Three authors forced a $1.5 billion settlement. Imagine what hundreds could do.
Transparency is essential. Without clear information on which books are used, authors can’t protect their rights.
Writer contracts need updating. If you’re signing a deal today, check whether AI training rights are covered—and ask for them if they’re not.
Copyright registration isn’t optional. If your work isn’t registered with the U.S. Copyright Office, you’re unlikely to benefit from any settlement.
Takeaway: Writers can’t stop AI from developing, but we can insist on fair rules. That means organizing, registering, and pushing for contracts and systems that acknowledge the value of our work.
Closing Thought
The Anthropic case is a turning point, but it’s not the end. A $1.5 billion figure grabs attention, but until courts approve the settlement and authors see a fair process, the fight isn’t over.
For writers, the message is clear: our words aren’t just stories on a page anymore. They’re the training ground for the next generation of machines. That means they’re valuable—not just to readers, but to the companies building the future.
And if they’re valuable, then writers deserve to be part of the conversation about how they’re used, and how we’re paid.
Our upcoming Author Insider events
Open to all members: founding, paid, and free. Join live, ask your questions, and connect directly with industry leaders.
Friday, September 12th, at 12 p.m. ET
Katy Milkman: From Academia to Bestseller
Wharton professor and How to Change author Katy Milkman shares how she went from academic to bestselling writer—while balancing research, writing, publicity, and publishing. Bring your questions on habits, books, and impact.
Thursday, September 18th, at 11 a.m. ET
The Business of Ghostwriting with Will Storr
Author of Selfie and The Science of Storytelling, Will Storr is also a sought-after ghostwriter for leaders and celebrities. Learn the craft, the hustle, and the hidden power of ghostwriting—whether you want to hire one or become one.
Thursday, September 25th, at 12 p.m. ET
AMA (Ask Me Anything) with Charles Duhigg
Pulitzer Prize–winner and author of The Power of Habit and Supercommunicators, Charles Duhigg joins us live to answer your questions on writing, research, and building a bestselling career.
Can’t make the live event? No worries—paid members get the highlight posts, your backstage pass to the best insights. If you’re serious about building your writing career, and want the smartest ideas distilled for busy people like you, upgrade to paid today.